![]() ![]() Of course, there is the fact that pro/rel does not stop the continuous inflow of investment into clubs all around the world. Often anonymous users will happily lob criticisms of the system, which can pretty much be boiled down into four categories: Especially online on social media, comments stubbornly denouncing pro/rel will undoubtedly tag on to anything promoting the idea. Those sympathetic to adopting pro/rel are often met with vocal detractors. USSF) are responsible for deciding these issues, not the leagues (MLS/USL/NISA). ![]() ![]() All without having won on the field to earn a place.Īrticle 9.4 states that member associations (i.e. All were existing USL or NASL teams, which were shuttered and replaced with new legal entities before joining MLS. Louis (partial ownership shared with folded USL club it replaced). Article 9.3 prohibits altering the legal form of a company/club to “…facilitate receipt of a license for a domestic league championship.” It would appear that eight, arguably nine, MLS clubs have violated this statute: Seattle, Portland, Vancouver, Montréal, Orlando, Minnesota, Cincinnati, Nashville, and St. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |